Duty and Obligation
The article discusses the distinction between duty (being honorable and ethical) and obligation (following the law), inspired by a SlashDot comment about Lavabit. The author argues that when laws are stretched beyond morality—whether for tax avoidance or security overreach—duty should take precedence.
Key Points
“You have a duty to be honourable and ethical. You have an obligation to do what is legal. They are not the same things.” — Jane Q Public
- MaidSafe’s Position: The company has a duty to provide Privacy, Security, and Freedom to everyone while remaining legally compliant. They cannot hand over user information due to their system design.
- Duty vs Legal Obligation: The author uses the example of jaywalking to help someone in danger—duty should override legal obligation in such cases.
- Historical Context: References NSA overreach and historical atrocities that occurred when people followed obligations over their duty to humanity.
- Conclusion: MaidSafe’s vision aligns with their duty, and they commend Lavabit for prioritizing duty over obligation.